# Approximating Bottleneck Spanning Trees on Partitioned Tuples of Points

## DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57717/cgt.v1i1.17## Abstract

We present approximation algorithms for the following NP-hard optimization problems related to bottleneck spanning trees in metric spaces.

1- The disjoint bottleneck spanning tree problem: Given n pairs of points in a metric space, find two disjoint trees each containing exactly one point from each pair and minimize the largest edge length (over all edges of both trees). It is known that approximating this problem by a factor better than 2 is NP-hard. We present a 4-approximation algorithm for this problem. This improves upon the previous best known approximation ratio of 9. Our algorithm extends to a (3k-2)-approximation for a more general case where points are partitioned into k-tuples and we seek k disjoint trees.

2- The generalized bottleneck spanning tree problem: Given n points in some metric space that are partitioned into clusters of size at most 2, find a tree that contains exactly one point from each cluster and minimizes the largest edge length. We show that it is NP-hard to approximate this problem by a factor better than 2, and present a 3-approximation algorithm.

3- The partitioned bottleneck spanning tree problem: Given kn points in some metric space, find k trees each containing exactly n points and minimize the largest edge length (over all edges of the k trees). We show that it is NP-hard to approximate this problem by a factor better than 2 for any k >= 2. We present an α-approximation algorithm for this problem where α = 2 for k = 2, 3 and α = 3 for k >= 4. Towards obtaining these approximation ratios we present tight upper bounds on the edge lengths of k equal-size disjoint trees that can be obtained from the nodes of a given tree. This result is of independent interest.

Our hardness proofs imply that it is NP-hard to approximate the non-metric version of the above problems within any constant factor. If we seek traveling salesperson tours (instead of trees) then our algorithms simply extend to achieve approximate solutions with factors three times those mentioned above.

## Downloads

## Published

## How to Cite

*Computing in Geometry and Topology*,

*1*(1), 3:1–3:18. https://doi.org/10.57717/cgt.v1i1.17

## License

Copyright (c) 2022 Ahmad Biniaz, Anil Maheshwari, Michiel Smid

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).